PF.OS Taxonomy
SIPOC · Human Agency Scale · v0.1 hypothesis
v0.1 hypothesis · pending validation with Matt + PF team

Punters Finance operating model,
mapped task-by-task.

Every Job-To-Be-Done across four ecosystem sides — decomposed into atomic tasks, each rated on the Stanford Human Agency Scale (H1 fully-AI → H5 human-essential), each mapped through SIPOC. This is the source-of-truth for what Max (the digital human), PF.OS (the orchestration layer), and real humans each own.

JTBDs
25
across 4 sides
Atomic tasks
108
each individually SIPOC-HAS'd
H5 hotspots
17
cannot compromise on human
Compliance
12
NCCP / Privacy / AI-transparency

Aggregate Human Agency Scale distribution

How the 108 tasks split across the five HAS levels. This is the shape of the blended workforce.

What is HAS?
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H1
38
35%
H2
27
25%
H3
10
9%
H4
16
15%
H5
17
16%
Reading: most tasks are H1–H2 (AI/automation candidates), H3 partnership is where diagnostic reframing lives, and H5 is small but sacred — the irreducible human core of PF.

Explore by ecosystem side

H5 hotspots — the irreducible human core

17 moments where PF's design says human must own this. Automating them would be a strategic mistake.

View all

How to read this taxonomy

Every task has one HAS rating. When you see H1 → H1 → H5 → H1 waveforms across a JTBD, that's not a mistake — it's the design principle: automate the mechanical, protect the emotional.

Read the method